Final software choice for my usage

Without being too critical of Zoneminder, I will just summarize that Blue Iris is for me.  I have finished installing 18 cameras in and around my home and the best way for me to tune the performance of these cameras was by utilizing the myriad of settings within the Windows based Blue Iris software.

For my purposes, I found nothing that Blue Iris couldn't do for me and there were many things with Zoneminder which were confusing at best.  I wish I could keep going with both solutions during my motion tuning phase, but the fact is with Blue Iris very tightly tuned on 18 cameras I am using approximately 45-60% CPU continuously on the VM Host.  I have assigned all 4 cores of my i7-7700 4.2GHz processor to the Windows machine and have nothing left for Linux.  Sorry Linus.

In some respects this is disappointing, but I think it proves the point very well.  If you like using a Graphical User Interface (GUI) and are comfortable with Windows - don't even worry what you are missing by going with the Open Source NVR software.  As far as I can tell you are not missing anything and gaining a lot.  I'm open to feedback on this statement because I honestly didn't get down to the real nuts and bolts - I'm anxious to hear what Zoneminder users feel Blue Iris doesn't do for them.

Please stand by for my final blog post on Prosumer Video Surveillance where I will show how the entire system has been designed, built and how I tuned it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blue Iris Initial Performance Testing

NVR Testing Platform

Installation: Blue Iris versus ZoneMinder